Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The Glad Game

If you've read the book or seen the movie, you know that Pollyanna is a big proponent of the Glad Game. Which is, basically finding a reason to be glad about everything—even if at first glance, you think it kind of sucks. I am big fan of this way of thinking. I honestly feel that positive thinking creates a healthier, better life. I believe you become what you think about. And oh boy, would I like to be glad.

Sometimes (like today), it's harder than others to play the Glad Game: it's raining; I feel stuck, unchallenged, and unmotivated at work (and I greatly desire a new job that actually fulfills me); I most likely have some female hormonal thing like PMS going on, etc. I've already cried like three times today. Over not much.

So it's times like these that it's even more important to play the Glad Game. One cannot get out of one's funk if one continues to think funky thoughts. So here are some glad thoughts to counter the bad thoughts:

  • I'm glad all the rain will help the trees, grass, and flowers grow and we'll have a lovely spring because of it
  • I'm glad I work with such amazing people that I enjoy being around
  • I'm glad I have a job that gives me a salary and health benefits
  • I'm glad I no longer have the devil IUD that caused even more female hormonal PMS-like things (and very frequently too)
  • I'm glad I don't keep my emotions all bottled up inside

And here's some more random glad thoughts to further help get me going toward a sunnier outlook:

  • I'm glad I have this beautiful little yellow rose in a cute little blue pot on my desk—it's sunny & cheerful
  • I'm glad I finally watched the videos for The Black Keys', Tighten Up and Howlin' for You - those are funny guys who write some pretty great songs (yes, I'm a bit behind the times as far as music videos go)
  • I'm glad my sister and her husband get to go to Orlando next week—and get to go to the Wizarding World of Harry Potter and Disneyworld and other amazing Florida stuff
  • I'm glad I have the two cutest little basement cats ever (okay, cutest cats ever, regardless of fur color)
  • I'm glad I have a stack of 12 library books at my house (and one at work)
  • I'm glad I found cute black ballet flats with little birdies on the inside at H & M this past weekend
  • I'm glad I'm a brunette now (I look best with brown hair, I think)
  • I'm glad I'll come home to find Mad Men Season 4, discs one and two waiting for me in their little red Netflix envelopes in my mailbox
  • I'm glad I got to see my grandparents this weekend and hear interesting stories about their lives and see interesting keepsakes (including my great-great-grandfather's potato that he kept in his pants pocket to help his arthritis and my great-grandmother's pair of glasses from the 50s or 60s)
  • I'm glad I have a beautiful black PT Cruiser—I love my car!
  • I'm glad I get to each lunch now!

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

The Shadow of the Wind


This is a gorgeous book. I mean that literally—look at that cover! I was browsing in Barnes & Noble one day and happened upon the Z section of Fiction and this book jumped out at me. I just thought the cover was stunning and intriguing. So, I read the back of the book and deemed it even more intriguing.

It's the story of Daniel Sempere, who lost his mother to cholera and has lived alone with his father since. Daniel's father, a bookseller, takes him to a wonderful place called the Cemetery of Forgotten Books (I seriously could spend months in a place like that). There, he finds a book called The Shadow of the Wind by Julián Carax. Mesmerized by its story, Daniel sets out to find more of Carax's books. Unfortunately, no one has any—they're all being bought up, stolen, and burned. Of course, this just makes Daniel all the more curious and he goes to great lengths to find out the truth about Julián Carax and why his books are being systematically destroyed.

It's a mystery set in Spain in the 1940s and 1950s and the way Carlos Ruiz Zafón describes places and people and the feeling of the time, you feel as if you really were there. Zafón's way with words is a magical gift. His writing is purely beautiful without being too flowery or over the top. For example, here is the opening of the novel:
I still remember the day my father took me to the Cemetery of Forgotten Books for the first time. It was the early summer of 1945, and we walked through the streets of a Barcelona trapped beneath ashen skies as dawn poured over Rambla de Santa Mónica in a wreath of liquid copper.
Can't you just picture it and feel it? I can! You can tell that Zafón is a great lover of books as well. Take this quote from Daniel's father about the Cemetery of Forgotten Books:
This is a place of mystery, Daniel, a sanctuary. Every book, every volume you see here, has a soul. The soul of the person who wrote it and of those who read it and lived and dreamed with it. Every time a book changes hands, every time someone runs his eyes down its pages, its spirit grows and strengthens. This place was already ancient when my father brought me here for the first time, many years ago. Perhaps as old as the city itself. Nobody knows for certain how long it has existed, or who created it. I will tell you what my father told me, though. When a library disappears, or a book shop closes down, when a book is consigned into oblivion, those of us who know this place, its guardians, make sure that it gets here. In this place, books no longer remembered by anyone, books that are lost in time, live forever, waiting for the day when they will reach a new reader's hands. In the shop we buy and sell them, but in truth books have no owner. Every book you see here has been somebody's best friend. Now they have only us, Daniel. Do you think you'll be able to keep such a secret?"
I apologize for the lengthy quote, but it's just so beautiful. The man clearly loves his books. And it puts into words how I feel about physical books—there is something magical about reading a book: its smell, its feel, turning its pages...  e-readers may be very convenient, but I still get a kick out of books.

The mystery of Julián Carax is one that will keep you guessing (as any good mystery book will do). You never know which characters to trust and which clues will lead you in the right direction. Zafón lets you guess some secrets and then completely surprises you with others—ones you never saw coming. It's one of those books that when you finish it, you want to start it all over again because now you know what really happened and you want to see all of the foreshadowing and clues with knowing eyes.

I was reading this book on the bus the other day and a lady a couple people over asked me if I liked it. I told her I loved it! And she said it was one of her favorite books of all time. I can see why. I've never read a mystery told so beautifully and with such interesting and rich characters. I would love to re-learn all of the Spanish I've forgotten and read the book in its original language because I bet that's an even more amazing experience. I will be re-reading this one over and over again for years to come!

Monday, March 14, 2011

Random Thoughts on the Milennium Trilogy


I finally finished the last book in Stieg Larsson's Milennium trilogy this weekend. It makes me quite sad that he was unable to write more—although I do think that the ending of The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest serves as a nice ending to the whole series.  ou're not quite sure what will happen to Lisbeth and Mikael, but at least they're in a good place.

I know I attempted a comparison between book and movie for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, but I decided not to do the same for the other books and movies. As I stated in that blog post, I will always prefer the book to the movie. And, as I learned in the case of these books and movies, I should definitely not watch the movie based on the book so soon after reading the book—it just makes it so hard to enjoy the movie for what it is. But in the movies' defense, these books are so full of different characters and subplots, that it would be impossible to make the movies just like the books. There will be some inevitable shaving down of parts and characters. And I think if I re-watch these movies at another time, I will enjoy them much more! I definitely think people who have not read the books would think the movies were incredibly awesome.

So, I have read that Stieg Larsson planned to do more books in this series, but his untimely death put a stop to that. I have also read that his partner may continue writing the books based on what he had written so far and his outlines. I'm not sure how I feel about that, but it might be nice to get answers to some unanswered questions I have. Namely:

  • Whatever happened to Lisbeth's sister—was she going to enter the picture at any point?
  • Does Lisbeth ever regain her interest for math and Fermat's theorem? Does she ever remember how she solved it?
  • Did she indeed have Asperger's syndrome?
  • Why was she so interested in DNA? Was she looking for some connection between her and her father (and possibly half-brother and why it was he was born with that condition where he doesn't feel pain)?

I also would love to hear about the end of the Blomkvist/Figueroa romance. I just didn't buy it. She seemed too needy to me—always trying to coerce him to spending more time with her. Just the sort of behavior that usually drives men away. But then again, he's used to very strong women, like Berger and Salander who don't require him to be around all the time, so maybe Figueroa was a breath of fresh air. And perhaps I didn't like Blomkvist falling for Figueroa because I was sort of expecting him and Salander to end up together. I am a sucker for a happy ending and I thought it was quite sad that the first time Lisbeth let her guard down enough to fall in love, he was too busy f'ing Erika Berger to even notice.

Speaking of Blomkvist, I wonder how Stieg Larsson saw him in his head—I could definitely tell that he was middle aged and not exactly a super model or in the awesomest of shape, but several women in the series did find him attractive, so he must have not been too bad. I liked that an average looking guy was hooking up with average looking women (perhaps Lisbeth is an exception to this, of course)—sometimes I get sick of reading books where everyone in them is gorgeous and desirable.

Once I got used to all of the Swedish names and places and worked through the boring financial portions, I was definitely hooked on these books. Larsson creates very unique and complex characters—even the bad guys have depth to them. I got so caught up in the lives of these characters and read for hours at a time to find out just what happened. In the second book when Palmgren revealed who Lisbeth's father was, I actually audibly gasped. And I cheered (in my head) for both Lisbeth and Annika at the trial as they kept beating the shit out of the prosecution (figuratively)—especially the part where Lisbeth takes Ekström to task for not asking actual questions.

I can definitely see why these books are best sellers and I will definitely be re-reading them in the future. I have a feeling that they're the kind of books where you discover something new every time you read them. And, of course, knowing how the story plays itself out will help you notice all the foreshadowing and clues that you probably didn't notice the first time. I'm kind of excited for enough time to pass so I can read them again!

Saturday, March 05, 2011

Stars and Books

I usually keep the image heavy and classic Hollywood posts for my other blog, but I found an adorable picture of Jean Harlow reading a book today and felt compelled to look for other similar pictures of my favorite classic stars. I also wanted to link to some great biographies about them, which really makes this sort of post more appropriate for this blog. So, here you go:

The aforementioned Jean Harlow shot. Just like Marilyn Monroe after her, she was way smarter than many people gave her credit for.

Grace Kelly. This is a shot from Rear Window (immediately after this shot, she whips out a Bazaar magazine and reads that instead).

Clara Bow. Don't read any of that Hollywood Babylon crap about her—read David Stenn's biography of her instead! She was an amazingly talented actress who had to overcome so much.

Norma Shearer. Another great book that deals a lot with Norma is Complicated Women: Sex and Power in Pre-Code Hollywood by Mick LaSalle—an incredible read!

Clark Gable—awww, he's reading one of my favorite books ever (and obviously preparing to be Rhett Butler). Admittedly, I have yet to read a Gable biography, so I feel funny recommending one. And most of the Gable biographies have such terrible reviews, so I'm just linking to the Clark Gable paper dolls—I loves me some Tom Tierney!

Margaret Mitchell. I had to follow up that picture of Clark Gable with this one! I have yet to read her biography, but I own it, so it's definitely on my "plan to read" list.

Vivien Leigh. Well, while we're on a Gone With the Wind roll... I haven't read her biography either, but this one got good reviews and the cover photograph is stunning!

Olivia de Havilland. Let's just complete the Gone With the Wind portion of this post with the lovely Melanie. I have yet to read a biography for her and I suspect there might be some trashiness to the books about her and Errol Flynn and her and her sister, so I'll just link to a book about her films.

Joan Fontaine. Speaking of Oliva de Havilland's sister...in a shot from Suspicion. I haven't read her autobiography, but I bet it's riveting!

Barbara Stanwyck. This shot is from Stella Dallas. I have read this biography by Al DiOrio, but it was written before she died. I'd like to read another, more recent biography some time and get the full story on this most amazing actress!

Joan Crawford. No, I have not read Mommie Dearest (although I have seen the movie) and I don't plan to. There's another Joan Crawford biography that recently came out, Possessed, and I really want to read it!

James Cagney. That man could sing and dance even better than he could play a gangster. I'd really like to read his autobiography!

Greta Garbo. I'd like to read other Garbo biographies to compare them to Barry Paris'—that one kind of left me depressed. But then again, Garbo didn't exactly have the most uplifting and happiest of lives. She's still as fascinating and glamorous as you can get!


Louise Brooks. Okay, so technically she's not the one reading in this picture. And man, does she look bored. In fact, so bored, she'd rather eat a donut.

Audrey Hepburn. Wow, there a LOT of pictures of Audrey Hepburn reading, but this is by far the coolest. I haven't read any of her biographies either, but this one by her son seems like it would be pretty cool.

Bette Davis. Seriously. This is an amazingly cute picture. Sadly, I haven't read any of her biographies either, so I'm linking to her autobiography.

Cary Grant. Sigh—yet another of my favorite actors that I haven't read about. Many of his biographies have good reviews, but I chose to link to a book about his style, because, c'mon, look at his style!!

Dean Martin. Ha! That's all I can say about this picture. Perhaps I should read his daughter's biography of him and see what it was like growing up with this guy!

F. Scott Fitzgerald. I would be remiss if I didn't include my favorite author ever. Not sure if he counts as a "star", but he was famous in his own day, so I think so. If you are a Fitzgerald fan and you haven't checked out The Romantic Egoists, you need to—SO amazing! An incredible peek into his private and professional life.

Gary Cooper. He had love affairs with my two favorite actresses ever, Grace Kelly and Clara Bow, so who knows why I haven't read any of his biographies. Perhaps this one by his daughter isn't the one to spill the beans about his romances, but it sure looks good! Oh, and how cute are pictures of stars reading the books their movies are based on (like that Clark Gable one)?!

Gloria Swanson. Look—they just happened to catch Gloria reading in her library, looking very pensive. I so need to read her autobiography!

Humphrey Bogart. Wow, another shot of an actor reading the book his movie is based on. Why is it always the men? Another star I haven't read about—probably because I've only seen his 30s movies and I'm sure most books would deal more with his later movies, life, and love with Lauren Bacall. This book about his films seems like it would be the most interesting to me.

Jeanne Moreau. I love French movies and I love Jeanne Moreau! Perhaps I should check out this biography of hers and write a review on it.

James Stewart (and Valerie Varda). There were some adorable pictures of Jimmy reading magazines, but I tried to stick to book pictures only, which is why I ended up with this shot from Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation. I haven't read any of Jimmy's biographies, but I have read his book of poems. And they're really cute.

Una Merkel. I was unable to find any books about Una Merkel. Sad face. But she is mentioned in Complicated Women: Sex and Power in Pre-Code Hollywood by Mick LaSalle and Sin in Soft Focus: Pre-Code Hollywood by Mark A. Vieira, both incredible reads with gorgeous pictures.

Walt Disney. Sweet Lord do I love this man. I started to read Walt Disney: The Triumph of the American Imagination by Neal Gabler, but found it too bogged down with facts and figures that I wasn't interested in—I wanted to know about the man himself—so I stopped reading it. Next up on my list is this one by Michael Barrier.

Unless otherwise noted, I have read the books I linked to and would recommend them to anyone interested in these stars or in classic Hollywood in general!

I leave you with a shot of my cat, Scarlett, who would really rather I pay attention to her than read:

(and yes, she is named after the character in Gone With the Wind—as is her sister, Melanie)

Monday, February 21, 2011

Book vs Movie


I am definitely one of those people who will always think that a book is better than the movie based on it. I often have to watch the movie version first so that I can actually enjoy it and not sit there thinking "That never happened! She doesn't look like that! They left out the best part!", etc. I know that it would be very hard-to-impossible to exactly translate a book into a movie—it probably wouldn't be as entertaining and the pacing would be off, etc. But even knowing this, I still get irritated at some of the liberties movie makers take when turning books into films.

Case in point, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil. I loooooved this book. Loved it. And I was so excited that they were making it into a movie—especially because I heard that Kevin Spacey would be playing Jim Williams. I have always been a big fan of Kevin Spacey and I just knew that he would be perfect in this role. I also was quite excited that John Cusack would be the narrator/lead character and that they got some of the real characters in the book to play themselves (like Lady Chablis). However, all of my excitement went right down the drain and was replaced with furious anger when I discovered that the character of Mandy (described in the book as being overweight and totally and completely in love with Joe Odom) was played by Clint Eastwood's thin, hot daughter and the character now fell in love with John Cusack's character. Really? Really?! I know such a little thing shouldn't have upset me so much, but it did. Did Clint Eastwood really have to beef up his own daughter's part like that? But even despite that annoying turn of events, the rest of the movie wasn't that great either. It definitely made me intensely dislike Clint Eastwood and I now have my own immature personal boycott of him and his films.

Okay, rant on the bad, bad movie over! I have actually seen movies that are very good interpretations of the books they are based on. Case in point, The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Peter Jackson, et al, left out only the parts that really didn't add to the story and they moved some things around and gave some lines to different characters, but all in all, these movies were incredibly faithful to the books. And I love them all!

The real point of this whole post was really to discuss The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, which I recently finished reading and watching. If you have not read or seen it yet, you probably don't want to read the rest of this post since there are some spoilers! The book took awhile for me to get into. I myself know nothing about the world of finance, so I was a bit bored and confused by the beginning. But I knew it'd get better and so I kept reading. And boy howdy, did it! I got a little confused at all the Swedish names and places and I had to constantly keep going back to the Vanger family tree at the beginning of the book, but I finally did manage to keep the characters straight.

Even though I normally watch the movie version of a book first so as not to be disappointed in it, I decided not to do that this time. I didn't want to have the mystery solved for me in movie form—I wanted to read about it. And I'm sure glad I did! I thoroughly enjoyed the book and expected no less from the movie. The movie stayed mostly true to the story, with a few derivations for entertainment and simplicity's sake. It was totally understandable (and even preferable) that they cut down the family tree a bit and made Henrik the uncle of Harriet instead of her great-uncle. I also felt that Noomi Rapace was totally believable as Lisbeth Salander, even though she was more buff and boy-like than the tiny and doll-like description given in the book. I often get irritated when the movies change the hair color of characters from what they're supposed to be—because c'mon, how hard is it to get a freaking wig or to dye the actors' hair? But I get that for the story's sake, they had to make Harriet a blonde in the movie so that she'd look like Anita. I would just think that after she disappeared, Harriet would definitely want to change up her whole appearance so as not to be identified as herself. I also get why they had Lisbeth discover the connection between the names and numbers in Harriet's diary and the Bible verses instead of having Blomkvist's daughter do it, like in the book—it definitely simplified things to have it that way in the movie. Also, having Lisbeth provide Blomkvist with all of the damaging evidence against Wennerström in the movie instead of having Vanger promising to do so and then delivering old info and then having Lisbeth get the real dirt simplified the plot line and gave the movie a neat ending.

One thing I did not like about the movie were the allusions to "All the Evil". Since I have not finished the other books in the trilogy, I do not know exactly what "All the Evil" is yet. And gee, now I know it involves a younger Lisbeth, fire, and someone in a car. Thanks, movie makers, for ruining the surprise for me! The second time they showed the flashback, I looked away until I could tell it was over. And even though I still don't know exactly what "All the Evil" is from watching the movie, I would have rather discovered what it is in its entirety from the book, in Stieg Larsson's words (or rather, his words translated into English). I am almost halfway done with The Girl Who Played with Fire, so I gather I shall be in the know soon. And I'm sure the movie makers assumed that many people seeing the movie would have already read all the books and know what happened. But still, I was a bit upset that they put this in the first movie.

I also did not like that they had Martin Vanger try to avoid hitting the truck and going off the road and begging Lisbeth to save him when in the book, he drove straight into the truck, committing suicide because he knew he couldn't face the consequences of his actions and possibly because he knew his sick, murderous activities could not possibly continue now that he was caught, so what's the use of living? I guess this change of events in the movie showed again that Lisbeth had absolute hatred for men who abuse women, but I personally thought that was already evident.

I kind of felt sorry for the movie version of Blomkvist because he didn't get nearly as much action as the book Blomkvist did! His relationship with Erika was only shown in passing in the movie and he never even hooked up with Cecilia at all! He did get to have sex with Salander, so at least he scored there. But man, if I was Michael Nyqvist, I'd be pissed that I missed out on all the hot sexy time!

All in all, I thought it was a great movie version of a book. If I had not read the book before I watched the movie, I probably would have enjoyed it a bit more, but there's just something about reading a mystery before you watch it—it's more intense and suspenseful if you have to read it. It takes no effort to sit and watch a movie for two hours and find out what happens, but it (obviously) takes lots more time and effort to sit and read a book. And when you find you can't put it down because you're so invested in the story and finding out what happens, that's what makes books magical!

Monday, February 07, 2011

Strangers

Sometimes I wonder about the lasting impressions I make on strangers. Not like a "Oh my God, does that girl think this outfit look stupid?" type wondering, more like, "I wonder if I've ever said or done anything that stayed with a complete stranger for a long time?"

Case in point—I simply cannot listen to The Light of a Fading Star without growling the line "And the light..." and balling up my fists like a really drunk guy I saw at a Flogging Molly show in Arizona in 2005. Seriously. Six years later, and I'm still doing it.

I wonder if anyone ever imitates me like I imitate that guy? And all I have to do is sing "And the light..." and my sister and brother-in-law know exactly who I'm talking about too. I wonder if that guy knows he's famous. Well, to us.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

I Love West Seattle!

So last night, after posting about how much I love the trees and wildlife in West Seattle, I was definitely in the mood to take a little walk down to the beach. And I saw some amazingly beautiful sights:

 
Seriously—look at that beautiful sky and its reflection in the beautiful water! And hey, a little bit of a bare tree in front of the sky too—yay!

 
Okay, so this is blurry (taken w/ my camera phone), but this is a bunch of ducks all bathing out in the Puget Sound—so cute!

 
Another view of the Puget Sound.

 
And I'm back to get a shot of that tree and the white house from the first picture—I love that house! In fact, I love all of the older houses along the beach in West Seattle. One of the best things about West Seattle is that most of the houses and apartment buildings look completely different—there's no attempt to make everything match or fit in the same mold. Every time I drive down my street, I feel like I'm in a vacation town. It's a good feeling!

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

It's the Little Things

I'm big on noticing the little things. Okay, so maybe they're not literally "little" things, but they're the things you might normally overlook in day to day life. There are certain things that I see almost every day, but when I pay special attention to them, I get super happy and feel blessed and all special inside. For example:

 
Bare trees silhouetted against the sky.
I love a bare tree—I think it's just so beautiful and elegantly skeletal. And to see one with a beautiful sky in the background is even more breathtaking. Obviously this is only a sight for late fall into winter, so I have to take advantage of it while I can. Luckily, with the amount of trees in Washington, this is not a problem!

 
Washington's fall leaves.
Another reason I look forward to the fall—the leaves turning colors. I think Washington has the most beautiful fall leaves because they're all mixed in with our evergreens and you get a whole beautiful rainbow of oranges, browns, yellows, reds, and greens. But then again, I may be biased. ;)

 
The birds of West Seattle.
I love crows. LOVE them. I think they're the most beautiful bird ever. Probably because I just love all-black animals (again, I might be biased, having two all-black cats). But I also love hearing their caws. I also love seagulls—just seeing and/or hearing one makes me feel so giddy that I live this close to the Puget Sound. And blue jays—man are they pretty! Technically, this bird pictured is a Steller's Jay and I think that's the kind I see in my back yard, but then again, I know absolutely nothing about birds, so I could be wrong. All I know is that they're blue and they look like that little guy. I get to see all three of these kinds of birds quite frequently in West Seattle and I love it every time my attention is called to one of them.

 
Squirrels.
Man, are these little guys cute! Once, there was a little squirrel running about the apartment complex I lived in. On a whim, I called him over to me, like you would a cat or dog—and he totally came! Right up to my foot! And then proceeded to climb up my pants leg. I thought this was pretty awesome until I started to wonder if he would keep climbing up me and scratch my eyes out and give me rabies. So I ran. He still kept a hold on my pants.  So I shook him off. But then I felt really bad because I was sure he didn't mean any harm. I went back to where he was and called him over again. He gingerly came towards me, but then I got freaked out again and ran away. And then I called him back and he started to come again. And then I got scared and ran away again. He stopped coming after that—no matter how I called to him. Sigh. Anyway, despite my fear of getting my eyes scratched out with rabies infested claws, I still love squirrels and thoroughly enjoy it whenever I see them. Seriously—so cute!

 
Daffodils.
My favorite flower ever! This one I have to wait for winter/spring to see, but it's worth the wait. They're just so sunny and beautiful! Every year when I first see daffodils being sold at Trader Joe's, I get the happies. Maybe I'm biased towards daffodils because I'm from Puyallup and we had the whole Daffodil Festival and Daffodil Parade (and my grandmother was a Daffodil Princess back in the day!). But they really are a beautiful flower and it makes me so happy when they're in bloom.

Wow, I just noticed that all of these "little" things are found in nature. Yet, I would never ever consider myself a nature person. It just goes to show you how the great outdoors can really feed your soul. And I leave you with a picture of two of my favorite things—a murder of crows in a bare tree silhouetted against the sky:
 

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Twilight gives me a happy

I LOVE Twilight. I LOVE the book series. I LOVE the movie (not as much as the books, but still a lot). I LOVE the whole thing. So, it's not unusual that I would get a tad bit defensive when people bash it. I shouldn't care about others' opinions, but I feel like they are bashing it for the wrong reasons. It's fine if you just don't like Twilight, but if you hate it because it doesn't follow traditional vampire mythology or because millions of teenage girls do, those are the wrong reasons.

First and foremost, Twilight is an epic romance. It is not supposed to be a series about vampires. However, the vampire/immortal element is incredibly vital to the story. What could be more epically romantic than everlasting love? And, of course, what epic love story isn't about two lovers from different worlds? Add in rivalry between vampires and werewolves and you've got conflict and also your love triangle. What I love most about Twilight is the love story, not the vampires.

Secondly, who cares if Stephenie Meyer made up her own vampire mythology? That's what fiction writers do—they make shit up! So, it doesn't follow traditional vampire rules—who's to say that those are or should be the ones followed in any vampire related fiction? True, the sparkling in sunlight thing was a bit weird—especially for someone who loves Buffy as much as I do and was expecting Edward to explode in a puff of dust. I can definitely understand having a hard time getting past the new vampire mythology if you are a true vampire fiction connoisseur. But I still think the love story is more important than any license Stephenie Meyer took with vampires.

I recently saw a comment from someone saying that Twilight wasn't written well—really? I couldn't put it down. Books that keep you reading for hours on end are well written books in my opinion. Books that you can't wait to get back to and books that you are sad when they're done are extremely well written books. The entire Twilight series is extremely well written. But, then again, that is my opinion and I shouldn't be surprised that someone doesn't agree with me. However, it is also my opinion that this person discriminated against the series because it doesn't follow traditional vampire lore and because it's so popular with the mainstream. But, I also have to acknowledge that there is the possibility that some people just plain don't like the books.

As for the movie, it's definitely not as good as the book—but what movie is? However, I think the casting was incredible. I cannot imagine two people more perfect for Bella and Edward than Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson. The rest of the cast is amazing as well (although I don't honestly believe Forks is as diverse as Catherine Hardwicke would have us believe). And there were some silly choices like having the vampires climbing trees like monkeys and Eric's hair, but I digress. It was still a really good movie and I am super excited for New Moon.

I know not everyone in the world likes Twilight, but I do wish more people would give it a chance and not dismiss it as a teenybopper book about vampires that sparkle. Ever since my sister got me hooked on these books, I've been in love with them. And I am not ashamed to say that I am a 32 year old Twilight fan.

Thursday, December 04, 2008

Writing about Writing

01.27.2011 Note—this entry was written back in 2008 when I was apparently going through a period of not using proper capitalization. Instead of fixing it, I think I'll just let it be—a glimpse into someone who apparently didn't feel important enough to capitalize "i" (or someone who thought it was really cool not to capitalize—I can't recall).

when i was in 1st or 2nd grade, i was supposed to read a book and write a book report about it. well, i didn't. i don't remember why, because i've always loved reading. but i just didn't. so i made up a book and wrote a book report about it. i don't remember the plot of the book, but i do know that it involved mice.

in 1984, we went to disneyland for my 7th birthday (coincidentally, 1984 was donald duck's 50th birthday and he's always been my favorite!). i was so enamored of the matterhorn and its scary abominable snowman that i wrote a story called "night at switzerland" (how i knew the matterhorn was in switzerland at age 7 is beyond me—perhaps i asked my parents?). in this story, the abominable snowman terrorizes an old lady who ends up stabbing him with her hair pins.

luckily, my parents kept this story, along with others, that i actually made into books. i put the pages of the story in between construction paper and draw covers for the books and sometimes illustrate the stories as well. i love looking back at them and seeing how creative i was as a kid.

i wrote the longest story i had ever written in 3rd grade, about the train tracks behind my house and a scary ghost that followed me and my friend sarah. it doesn't read so well, but hey, i was 8. it wasn't super long, but it did have multiple chapters.

in 4th grade, i wrote a story that got me into the young authors' conference. it was about the jungle and it involved lions and gorillas and other jungle animals. the speaker at the conference was the guy who wrote some story about paul bunyan. we all got an autographed copy of the book. i was the only one from my class that went and my mother made me sit next to my old pre-school friend, julie, who i hadn't seen since pre-school since i had moved away and now we attended different schools. she was already with a friend and she was way cooler than i was. needless to say, i felt like a huge dork. however, because my story was selected, it was put into our elementary school library for people to check out. no one but me ever did. i think i ended up stealing it and then writing in a bunch of due dates on its library card to make it look like it had been checked out a lot.

subsequent years are kind of hazy, but it's possible i refused to write stories for submission to the young authors' conference because of the horrible time i had there or i did write stories and they were accepted, but i just refused to go or i wrote stories, but they were not accepted. in any case, i never went to another young authors' conference again.

i did, however, still enjoy writing. i don't think i ended up writing much fiction in junior high (at least that i saved), but i did write a paper for my friend deanna that was about my cat caesar and his squishy skin and bladder that was as hard as an orange. i'm not sure why deanna would ever write about my cat, but she didn't seem to care that i wrote about him. and neither did our teacher.

i wrote some papers in college too—for my friend jodi. i have no idea what they were about, but i think they got her good grades. college was just a time of abundant writing—lots of papers on lots of subjects. not nearly as much fun writing, though.

because i thought i wanted to be a dietitian, i took a whole bunch of nutrition and science classes in college. there was not much time to take cool classes about writing (unless you count technical writing, which i do not) or foreign languages (although i did take a year of spanish). however, i did still get in a LOT of writing. after college came grad school and more writing. about nutrition.

when i started working as a dietitian, i found the only parts i enjoyed were figuring out patients' tube feeding and TPN needs and making patient education handouts. the tube feeding and TPN stuff has nothing to do with writing, but more to do with math. not that i really enjoy math, but i do find some calculations fun to do. anyway, my enjoyment with the handouts should have clued me into the fact that i still loved to write and that i should do so more often. but it didn't.

after i couldn't stand working in nutrition any longer (i hated the one-on-one contact with patients, i hated the fact that they just didn't care, i didn't care myself what they were or weren't eating, i felt i just didn't know enough to be considered an expert, etc, etc), i decided to work in a record store. mainly because i was dating a musician and i decided that i wanted to work for a record label and thought this would be good practice. that didn't pay the bills, so i had to add on a second job of admitting patients to an urgent care center. fun!

as you can tell, neither of these jobs anything to do with writing creatively. and so, while they provided a welcome relief from nutrition, they weren't making me happy either. finally, because both of those jobs together were still way less paying than being a dietitian, i decided to find another nutrition job.

luckily, i found a job as a "nutritionist" (i put that in quotes because there is no real meaning behind that title—anyone can call themselves a "nutritionist" and get away with it) at drugstore.com. technically, it would be answering nutrition questions about dr. weil, the zone, pritikin, and kathy smith vitamins. at first, it was a dream come true. all i had to do was answer emails and phone calls and spit back information already provided by dr. weil, dr. sears, dr. pritikin, and kathy smith. we weren't allowed to give our own opinions! it was perfect because i always felt that my nutrition knowledge was lacking (even though i had a master's degree in it!) and because i was making more money.

not long after i started, it was made abundantly clear that i wasn't just a nutritionist, i was also a customer service representative. so i had to answer calls and emails about when orders were going to ship, or why is this an auto-ship program, etc. in addition to questions about calcium and side effects of supplements. i had enough of that kind of stuff when i worked in a mall and i was not a fan of those types of duties. i became very unhappy in my work and remembered why i quit nutrition in the beginning—i mostly just didn't care about other peoples' health. not that i don't wish everyone in the world a very happy and healthy life—i do! but i care about what food i eat and what pills i take and not what others do.

i hated my job, but didn't know what to do. i joined a weekly class in seattle that met to discuss ourselves and our job history and determine what kinds of things we might enjoy doing for a career. it was more touchy, feely than just taking some quiz that tells you what you're supposed to be and i really did enjoy it. everyone in my class told me that i was really creative and a good writer. i agreed with them (while still kind of doubting them because i had super low self esteem), but never decided to pursue any kind of creative or writing job.

luckily, i soon found a new job within the company, but in the marketing department. it was something new and it was an entry level position, so i didn't need to know anything about marketing (which was good because i didn't). i loved it from the beginning. it was more calculations (yay!) and involved some slight creativity (such as which products to choose for different gift guides).

last year, we visited MSN to show them our hot products for holiday and they mentioned they wanted content from their partners to put in their "shopping advice" section. something told me to speak up, so i did—i offered to write content for drugstore.com and Beauty.com. MSN was happy and so were my bosses. and me—i was ecstatic. it felt great. i would be able to write and keep my current job. fantastic!

so i wrote 20 articles for MSN—just simple, themed articles like "choosing a quality electric shaver" (the WORST article to write ever—mostly because i don't care about men's shavers) and "smoking cessation: which products to choose". it was very exciting to see my articles on MSN—complete with my name!

after that, sometimes we'd pitch editorial ideas to MSN and they'd want me to write an article around it. one such idea was highly rated as seen on tv products. that article was on their homepage, with a huge slide. tons of people who went to MSN that day saw my article and my name! it was so awesome! and we got tons of orders from it too. everyone was happy.

i've written a lot more articles for MSN (and they also appear on AOL, Yahoo, and Shop.com) about products we sell on drugstore.com and Beauty.com. the articles are also on our sites (however, our creative team edited them first—they heavily edited the Beauty.com ones—and that kind of hurt my feelings, but it really shouldn't).

even though it was rad to be able to write in my current job, i grew tired of writing about products i've never seen or tried and wanted to quit and work somewhere else that i could write as my primary job, but write about stuff i truly cared about. i kept looking for new jobs daily for a looooong time, but with no luck. i had even told people at work that i was planning on leaving. however, i think i was just unhappy in life. i was depressed without knowing it and feeling uncreative and stifled and lost and sad. it was felt in all areas of my life.

i finally decided to get on meds for depression, which helped a lot. but, not long after that, i decided that anti-depressants were not for me and i weaned myself off of them and worked on my depression by attacking my low self esteem and changing the way i thought about myself and everything. it made a huge, huge, huge difference and i'm happier now than i've ever been as an adult, maybe even happier than i was as a kid.

one of the steps to becoming happier is to do the things that feed your soul, the things that make you the happiest. writing was definitely one of those for me. so i was determined to write a lot more! however, things don't always work out like you plan.

i had some things going on in my personal life that were still kind of making me sad sometimes and i hadn't completely overcome my low self esteem. i started to doubt my skill as a writer and to dread writing articles for work. because i kept telling myself that i sucked and that writing these articles was such a drag, i no longer enjoyed it. i started to put off writing and in some cases, even flat out refuse to write. it wasn't a case of writer's block, it was a case of not wanting to write.

so, thank the sweet Lord that my sister made me read the "twilight" series. i read through those books so fast and enjoyed them so thoroughly that it gave me the desire to write again. i had this idea for a book awhile back (i even wrote the first chapter), heavily influenced by a couple of tv shows i love and another series of books i love, but i hadn't worked on it in so long. suddenly, my idea still sounded good and i wanted to work on it some more.

and i started reading "bird by bird" by anne lamott and was incredibly enthused by it (well, not like i've gotten far, but still, the introduction and first chapter were really inspiring). my creativity is dying to come out!!

but i still find it hard to write those articles for work, to work on my book, to even update this blog or write short stories and post them to my writerscafe.org profile. i tell myself it's because i'm busy—work is hectic during the holidays, it gets dark earlier, my mom is in town and i spend a lot of time with her, etc, etc. i don't know why i'm resistant to writing. i know i enjoy it. i know i'm good at it. i know it's good for me. so why?! why?!

it's amazing when you have to force yourself to do the things you like to do. i'm not one of those people who is always trying to do things for others and puts herself last. just the opposite—i always put myself first. maybe i just care too much about what other people think and maybe i still doubt my talent as a writer and i don't want to expose myself to criticism. or maybe my ego is trying to stop my higher self from being in charge (i read a lot of hay house books, if you couldn't tell. they're incredibly insightful and have helped me immensely).

in any case, i have decided to do just that—force myself to write. every day. it's what they tell you you have to do. so i will!